top of page

Navigating Person-First and Community-First Language

Language is a dynamic tool that shapes our perceptions and interactions. It differs for different communities and is something that continues to be explored and improved upon. Person-first language and community-first language is a topic that has been significant in the language conversation, so let's dive into understanding when to use each and the ongoing evolution of language in our diverse communities.

Person-First Language: Emphasizing Dignity and Individuality

Person-first language serves as a means to prioritize the person or group over their condition or identity. The aim is to promote dignity and recognize individuals beyond their characteristics or circumstances. For instance, instead of saying "poor people," a more inclusive alternative would be "people with lower socioeconomic status." This linguistic choice emphasizes the person first, reinforcing their humanity before any defining characteristic.

When to Use Person-First Language

Person-first language is apt when the goal is to emphasize the individual's humanity and promote inclusivity. It is particularly relevant in contexts where focusing on the person is essential, overshadowing aspects of their identity or condition.

Identity First and Community Chosen Language: Honoring Identity and Preferences

On the other hand, identity-first language comes into play when an individual or community's identity is central to the communication. This is especially true when there is a community consensus or preference for a specific language. For instance, referring to the "Black community" or a "Deaf person" instead of using person-first language.

When to Use Identity First and Community Chosen Language

Identity-first language is appropriate when the identity is crucial to the context and there is a shared consensus within the community for the preferred language. It respects the autonomy of communities to define their own terms and identity.

The Ongoing Evolution of Language

Language is not static; it evolves to reflect societal changes, inclusivity efforts, and community preferences. In the case of person-first and identity-first language, it's crucial to recognize that language choices may vary across different communities and contexts. Understanding the ongoing evolution of language requires a commitment to staying informed about community preferences and adapting our language use accordingly.

Nuances and Respectful Communication

Navigating the nuances of language requires a deep understanding of the impact our words can have on individuals and communities. While person-first language promotes inclusivity and dignity, identity-first language respects the autonomy of communities to define their own terms. It's essential to approach language choices with sensitivity, actively listening to the preferences of the communities we engage with.

The choice between person-first and identity-first language is context-dependent, guided by the need to emphasize individuality, promote inclusivity, and respect community preferences. As language continues to evolve, our commitment to thoughtful, respectful communication ensures that our words contribute positively to the diverse and dynamic tapestry of human experience.


bottom of page